That depends on your definition of non-preemptive algorithm. If, to be considered one, it has to run all jobs until the end, then starvation can not occur. All the classic algorithms that I know, like FIFO or SJF, can't have starvation, since they will run all jobs until the end.
Full Answer
What is the algorithm for FIFO page replacement?
Algorithm for FIFO Page Replacement 1 Start to traverse the pages. 2 f the memory holds fewer pages then the capacity go to Step 3, else go to Step 5. 3 Push pages in the queue one at a time until the queue reaches its maximum capacity or all page requests are fulfilled. 4 If the current page is present in the memory, do nothing. More items...
Does SJF algorithm cause starvation?
That's why SJF algorithm leads to starvation. Click to see full answer. Keeping this in view, which scheduling algorithm causes starvation? Here are some Advantages: of using the Round Robin Scheduling: Each process is served by the CPU for a fixed time quantum, so all processes are given the same priority.
How to perform FIFO with pages in queue?
a) Insert page into the set one by one until the size of set reaches capacity or all page requests are processed. b) Simultaneously maintain the pages in the queue to perform FIFO. c) Increment page fault ii) Else If current page is present in set, do nothing.
Which scheduling algorithm leads to starvation?
Which scheduling algorithm leads to starvation? Pramod Soni : If you have a very long process and short processes keep coming up, SJF will swap to the short ones and keep the long process in the waiting pipe. That's why SJF algorithm leads to starvation. Click to see full answer.
Can FIFO cause starvation?
FIFO systems can have starvation when dealing with time bound things like web requests - slow request handlers can cause other (waiting) requests to timeout.
Which algorithm does not suffer from starvation?
FCFSIn FCFS there is no chance of starvation in both the cases of longer or shorter processes.
In which algorithm is starvation The biggest problem?
Problem. In priority-based scheduling algorithms, a major problem is indefinite block, or starvation. A process that is ready to run but waiting for the CPU can be considered blocked. A priority scheduling algorithm can leave some low-priority processes waiting indefinitely.
What is the disadvantage of FIFO scheduling algorithm?
Short jobs(process) may have to wait for long time. Important jobs (with higher priority) have to wait. cannot guarantee good response time.
Which algorithm causes starvation?
A possible solution to starvation is to use a scheduling algorithm with priority queue that also uses the aging technique. Aging is a technique of gradually increasing the priority of processes that wait in the system for a long time.
Does FCFS cause starvation?
Explanation: In First Come First Serve(FCFS) if a process with a very large Burst Time comes before other processes, the other process will have to wait for a long time but it is clear that other process will definitely get their chance to execute, so it will not suffer from starvation.
How can starvation be avoided?
To avoid starvation, we use the concept of Aging. In Aging, after some fixed amount of time quantum, we increase the priority of the low priority processes. By doing so, as time passes, the lower priority process becomes a higher priority process.
Which of the following scheduling algorithms eliminates the possibility of starvation?
First Come First Serve (FCFS) Eventually, every process will get a chance to run, so starvation doesn't occur.
In which algorithm is starvation or indefinite blocking the biggest problem options first?
the priority scheduling algorithmA major problem with the priority scheduling algorithm is indefinite blocking or starvation. This algorithm can leave some low priority processes waiting indefinitely. The solution to the problem of starvation is aging.
Can starvation occur in non preemptive scheduling?
You can't get starvation in non-preemptive schemes, as they will all run until the end, and you can't add any jobs. Preemptive schemes comes actually not to give all processes a share of CPU, but to make your system more responsive.
Why is first come first serve inefficient?
Because the CPU can only handle one order at a time, FCFS utilizes a minimal portion of your system's capabilities, rendering it very inefficient.
What advantages/disadvantages concerns are there with first come first serve scheduling?
First Come First Serve (FCFS):Advantages – It is simple and easy to understand.Disadvantages – The process with less execution time suffer i.e. waiting time is often quite long. Favors CPU Bound process then I/O bound process.